company of heroes modern combat different version multiplayer

New troops are not as effective as experienced veterans, so the winning commander typically has good micro-management and positioning skills. There's no Starcraft-style building queue and you aren't churning out units in their hundreds to send to their deaths like Command and Conquer.Ĭompany of Heroes is all about keeping each individual unit alive for as long as possible, adhering to cover, utilising special abilities and gaining further experience that translates into new advantages on the battlefield. There are no vast armies here, just a company of troops, where infantry are moved and requisitioned as a squad. The point is to capture and hold territory, which then furnishes you with resources to equip and expand your small force. The goal of the game is not just to overcome the enemy while micromanaging your base and resource gathering.

I was really eager to cover this one because it's an RTS with a very different spin, putting you in command of an allied or axis force from a top-down perspective.

So, on the one hand, it does feel like a missed opportunity to a certain extent but the flip side is that it's very easy to run on very high settings across a range of hardware. I'm enjoying the game but I don't feel it's pushing boundaries in the way that its predecessors did. If I had to sum up Company of Heroes 3 in a single sentence, I would say it is an excellent real-time strategy game that is technically sound - but also unambitious.

Company of heroes modern combat different version multiplayer